reddy2cool
09-12 12:58 PM
bump..guys plz do reply
wallpaper rad pitt body 2011. rad pitt
gparr
May 19th, 2004, 01:19 PM
Sorry, doesn't do much for me. Can you get the monitor with a game onscreen to reflect on the joystick in some way?
I thought toys would be an easy one, but everything I've thought of seems so obvious and cliched. I think you have the right idea, just don't think this one is it.
Gary
I thought toys would be an easy one, but everything I've thought of seems so obvious and cliched. I think you have the right idea, just don't think this one is it.
Gary
pokiri2008
02-29 07:54 AM
thank you
2011 Angelina Jolie Golden Globe
jsb
11-01 12:16 PM
Hello i am running in to issues of how to get address changed. To give you guys previews. We were residing in Chicago till July ending. In August we moved to CT as my wife got a new job there. But since my work location is in IL , I requested my employer whether its possible to work remotely and its ok by law. He said u can change ur residential address and there is no need to amend LCa/H1b as there is no change in work location in my case. Fine for now.
I recently visited CT DMV and requested for CT state license. They denied to me saying that i need a CT employer letter or My employer should issue letter to DMV stating my work location changed. Neither of these are going to happen. For now i have my license and Plate from IL itself. I can still continue to maintain but renewing Plates and Pollution test are pain being in CT any ideas please ?
I think it is just a heavyhandedness by DMV guys. Perhaps talking to the manager will help. Tell him that you wife lives in CT and you consider this as your home. There is nothing that you HAVE to live within xxx miles of your work place. If you live in CT, fly every Monday morning to IL, stay in a hotel at your own expenses, and return back on Friday, will that be illegal.
I recently visited CT DMV and requested for CT state license. They denied to me saying that i need a CT employer letter or My employer should issue letter to DMV stating my work location changed. Neither of these are going to happen. For now i have my license and Plate from IL itself. I can still continue to maintain but renewing Plates and Pollution test are pain being in CT any ideas please ?
I think it is just a heavyhandedness by DMV guys. Perhaps talking to the manager will help. Tell him that you wife lives in CT and you consider this as your home. There is nothing that you HAVE to live within xxx miles of your work place. If you live in CT, fly every Monday morning to IL, stay in a hotel at your own expenses, and return back on Friday, will that be illegal.
more...
adithi123
04-22 05:55 PM
I called up USCIS office. They have confirmed I need to send it to the one on the printout.
I have got my Receipt Notice
PS: I hunted on this topic for 20 minutes on the IV forum before I put this post..
-Abhi
I have got my Receipt Notice
PS: I hunted on this topic for 20 minutes on the IV forum before I put this post..
-Abhi
sagittariusarm
02-12 07:27 AM
My wife met with a very minor accident and it was her first accident. It was an on a unattended car. The back bumper of the car got scratched, The main mistake she did was , she did not leave a note and she came home, she basically panicked. She called me and I told her to go back and call police by that time, somebody complained to police and police came home and issued citation. According to Florida statues this is a criminal violation.
The following is the detail of the citation.
Crash: NO
Injury: NO
Serious Injury: NO
Property Damage: NO
Aggressive Driving - NO
Fatal: NO
I am in the process of talking to traffic violations related and Immigration attorney.
I would appreciate if somebody can please advice on the following.
1) What will happen to her I485 process? currently she has EAD and I485 is pending
2) She is unemployed currently but if she decides to work in the future will this cause any issues when employer does background check?
3) Attorney mentioned that he can clear the points and criminal violation records but will this still be a issue for I485 process?
Please let me know.
The following is the detail of the citation.
Crash: NO
Injury: NO
Serious Injury: NO
Property Damage: NO
Aggressive Driving - NO
Fatal: NO
I am in the process of talking to traffic violations related and Immigration attorney.
I would appreciate if somebody can please advice on the following.
1) What will happen to her I485 process? currently she has EAD and I485 is pending
2) She is unemployed currently but if she decides to work in the future will this cause any issues when employer does background check?
3) Attorney mentioned that he can clear the points and criminal violation records but will this still be a issue for I485 process?
Please let me know.
more...
spicy_guy
07-12 04:12 PM
Congrats, EB I guys.
We poor EB I guys need to shutter!!
We poor EB I guys need to shutter!!
2010 Best Golden Globes 2011 Beauty
canmt
11-14 08:50 AM
EB2 India Priority Date: 06/2003
I140 Approval Date: 01/2007
I485 Receipt Date: 02/2007
FP Notice: 02/2007
EAD Approval: 03/2007
AP Approval: 03/2007
AC21 & G28 Revoked: 10/2007
I485 RFE on AC21: 10/2007
I485 RFE Replied Date: 10/2007 (Self)
1485 Card Production Ordered (No Email): 11/2007
1485 Approval Notice Sent (With Email): 11/2007
Soft LUD: 11/2007
Card Received: 11/2007
Welcome Letter Received (No Email or Status Update): 11/2007
I140 Approval Date: 01/2007
I485 Receipt Date: 02/2007
FP Notice: 02/2007
EAD Approval: 03/2007
AP Approval: 03/2007
AC21 & G28 Revoked: 10/2007
I485 RFE on AC21: 10/2007
I485 RFE Replied Date: 10/2007 (Self)
1485 Card Production Ordered (No Email): 11/2007
1485 Approval Notice Sent (With Email): 11/2007
Soft LUD: 11/2007
Card Received: 11/2007
Welcome Letter Received (No Email or Status Update): 11/2007
more...
fromnaija
04-13 05:18 PM
IF he transfers to a function that is significantly different than his approved labor certification he may have to restart his GC application by filing a new LC application. However, since GC is for future job and if his employer will agree for him to go back to his previous practice then he may continue with current GC process and change when 485 is approved.
All,
My friend works as an internal auditor within a big 4 acccounting firm. His practice is doing quite badly. As there are tons of different practices within this firm, he is thinking about transferring. But his PERM was filed for the internal audit manager position and his I-140 has alreday been approved. If he transfers to a function unrelated to internal audit within his firm (e.g. external audit, tax, fraud, etc.), would there be a problem?
Can anyone here provide some guidance or point him to the right discussion thread?
Thanks!!!
All,
My friend works as an internal auditor within a big 4 acccounting firm. His practice is doing quite badly. As there are tons of different practices within this firm, he is thinking about transferring. But his PERM was filed for the internal audit manager position and his I-140 has alreday been approved. If he transfers to a function unrelated to internal audit within his firm (e.g. external audit, tax, fraud, etc.), would there be a problem?
Can anyone here provide some guidance or point him to the right discussion thread?
Thanks!!!
hair Angelina Jolie And Brad Pitt
Dhundhun
09-10 06:22 PM
Folks,
I got a RFE asking for a copy of birth certificate and bio info. I had sent my BC and bio info before while applying for 485 last august. I was hurrying up my lawyer to send the response as soon as possible.
My lawyer emailed me that since there is a spelling difference in the way my name is shown in my BC and in all other docs, I will be subject to additional security checks and there is no point in hurrying. Is this true or is my lawyer using this as a delay tactic ?
My name in my BC ends with .......iam and in all other docs ends with .....iyan. Should this cause a problem ?
Please share your thoughts and help me.
Lawyers can usually justfy some minor spelling mistakes and answer to RFE. Usually USCIS accepts BC name.
Based on inputs from my lawyer, there is some delay if such descrepency is there - he said that he can reply to such RFE and apart from delay there is no other issue.
I got a RFE asking for a copy of birth certificate and bio info. I had sent my BC and bio info before while applying for 485 last august. I was hurrying up my lawyer to send the response as soon as possible.
My lawyer emailed me that since there is a spelling difference in the way my name is shown in my BC and in all other docs, I will be subject to additional security checks and there is no point in hurrying. Is this true or is my lawyer using this as a delay tactic ?
My name in my BC ends with .......iam and in all other docs ends with .....iyan. Should this cause a problem ?
Please share your thoughts and help me.
Lawyers can usually justfy some minor spelling mistakes and answer to RFE. Usually USCIS accepts BC name.
Based on inputs from my lawyer, there is some delay if such descrepency is there - he said that he can reply to such RFE and apart from delay there is no other issue.
more...
aksaharan
09-24 03:46 PM
No More Visa Numbers Until October 1, 2010 - Department of State
The Department of State issued a letter to Section 245 Adjudications indicating that as of September 16, 2010, visas for FY2010 were no longer available for all family cases and for certain employment based cases (EB-2, EB-3, other workers, EB-4, and certain religious workers). FY2011 numbers will be available on October 1, 2010.
Source: US Immigration Law Blog - by Ashwin Sharma, Esq.: No More Visa Numbers Until October 1, 2010 - Department of State (http://ashwinsharma.com/2010/09/24/no-more-visa-numbers-until-october-1-2010--department-of-state.aspx)
The Department of State issued a letter to Section 245 Adjudications indicating that as of September 16, 2010, visas for FY2010 were no longer available for all family cases and for certain employment based cases (EB-2, EB-3, other workers, EB-4, and certain religious workers). FY2011 numbers will be available on October 1, 2010.
Source: US Immigration Law Blog - by Ashwin Sharma, Esq.: No More Visa Numbers Until October 1, 2010 - Department of State (http://ashwinsharma.com/2010/09/24/no-more-visa-numbers-until-october-1-2010--department-of-state.aspx)
hot images Golden Globes 2011
vandanaverdia
09-07 02:36 PM
My husband just booked tickets for Washington DC to attend the rally. Very excited to be part of this rally!
Would like to encourage people from WA state to plan on attending this rally & make a difference!
This is the time to act!!! We need more people, I don't see anyone from Seattle attending. I know there are thousands of GC applicants from here, come on guys, wake up and lets be heard. September 18, mark your calendars.
Would like to encourage people from WA state to plan on attending this rally & make a difference!
This is the time to act!!! We need more people, I don't see anyone from Seattle attending. I know there are thousands of GC applicants from here, come on guys, wake up and lets be heard. September 18, mark your calendars.
more...
house makeup, Golden Globes 2011
tb2904
07-02 12:14 PM
From immigration-law website.
The State Department has released the update. The sudden backlog reduction efforts by Citizenship and Immigration Services Offices during the past month have resulted in the use of almost 60,000 Employment numbers. As a result of this unexpected action it has been necessary to make immediate adjustments to several previously announced cut-off dates. All Citizenship and Immigration Services Offices have been notified of the following: Effective Monday July 2, 2007 there will be no further authorizations inresponse to requests for Employment-based preference cases. All numbers available to these categories under the FY-2007 annual numerical limitation have been made available. Employment preference numbers will once again be available to these chargeability areas beginning October 1, 2007, under the FY-2008 annual numerical limitation.
If visa number is unavailable in the Visa Bulletin, it appears that the USCIS is unable to accept the 485 applications under the USCIS regulation. It is thus likely that all the applications which they received or will receive today may be rejected and returned. The current situation is different from the other worker cases rejection in June in that in that case, the State Department did not officially revised the Visa Bulletin. However, we will have to wait and see the anticipated announcement from the USCIS.
This Visa Bulletin revision also implies that there will be no EB-485 approvals during July, August, and September 2007!!!!! Accordingly all the recent approvals practically ended as of July 1, 2007 and there will be no adjudication of any employment-based I-485 applications. For the reasons, those EB-485 waiters who fail to receive the approval notices within this week will have to endure further hardships and emotional trauma. Now, people understand what Washington did to them. Had they passed the SKIL bill, all of these problems would have disappeared. We still wonder who invented the point system that helped to induce the business community to oppose the CIR and partially killed the bill. History will tell.
The State Department has released the update. The sudden backlog reduction efforts by Citizenship and Immigration Services Offices during the past month have resulted in the use of almost 60,000 Employment numbers. As a result of this unexpected action it has been necessary to make immediate adjustments to several previously announced cut-off dates. All Citizenship and Immigration Services Offices have been notified of the following: Effective Monday July 2, 2007 there will be no further authorizations inresponse to requests for Employment-based preference cases. All numbers available to these categories under the FY-2007 annual numerical limitation have been made available. Employment preference numbers will once again be available to these chargeability areas beginning October 1, 2007, under the FY-2008 annual numerical limitation.
If visa number is unavailable in the Visa Bulletin, it appears that the USCIS is unable to accept the 485 applications under the USCIS regulation. It is thus likely that all the applications which they received or will receive today may be rejected and returned. The current situation is different from the other worker cases rejection in June in that in that case, the State Department did not officially revised the Visa Bulletin. However, we will have to wait and see the anticipated announcement from the USCIS.
This Visa Bulletin revision also implies that there will be no EB-485 approvals during July, August, and September 2007!!!!! Accordingly all the recent approvals practically ended as of July 1, 2007 and there will be no adjudication of any employment-based I-485 applications. For the reasons, those EB-485 waiters who fail to receive the approval notices within this week will have to endure further hardships and emotional trauma. Now, people understand what Washington did to them. Had they passed the SKIL bill, all of these problems would have disappeared. We still wonder who invented the point system that helped to induce the business community to oppose the CIR and partially killed the bill. History will tell.
tattoo makeup Golden Globes 2011
mrajatish
09-14 08:45 AM
1. Will your company keep your 140 alive? Meaning, will they withdraw it - I know a lot has been said about 140 PD being yours once approved and blah blah, but no one seems to report that they have successfully ported their 140 date to a new 140 application. This is strange but true. So I will make it doubly sure with my company.
2. Uscis might ask why your company is sponsoring two 140s for the same individual - your company should be prepared to answer that. This is exactly why my company refuses to reapply for the GC process for the same individual (it really raises a question of intent). Again, can be done, but needs full support from company
Rest should be ok.
2. Uscis might ask why your company is sponsoring two 140s for the same individual - your company should be prepared to answer that. This is exactly why my company refuses to reapply for the GC process for the same individual (it really raises a question of intent). Again, can be done, but needs full support from company
Rest should be ok.
more...
pictures makeup 2011 Golden Globes
zCool
03-31 11:27 PM
Last Status counts situation DOES NOT apply here.
That rule applies to situations where you've gone from h1b to h4 or ead etc..
In your case, you can have as many approved h1b petitions as possible since it's really petition approved for that employer and your are merely beneficiary.
BUT you can ONLY work for 1 employer at a time..
Going by your situation.. if you have approved h1 from company B and are working with company B. THEN you are okay.. to hell with what company A may choose to do..
That rule applies to situations where you've gone from h1b to h4 or ead etc..
In your case, you can have as many approved h1b petitions as possible since it's really petition approved for that employer and your are merely beneficiary.
BUT you can ONLY work for 1 employer at a time..
Going by your situation.. if you have approved h1 from company B and are working with company B. THEN you are okay.. to hell with what company A may choose to do..
dresses megan fox golden globes 2011
gconmymind
01-04 05:19 PM
Can you please also post some insurance names for everyone's benefit. Also, do you know the difference between consulting on 1099 vs. creating an LLC and consulting? Any advantage of having an LLC? It costs $800 per year to maintain in California. I tried to find info on the web, but am confused. Any pointers are appreciated!
more...
makeup I think Angelina Jolie has no
bigboy007
10-09 02:37 AM
Sorry..I have incorrectly named the thread..it suppose to read this way- "Changed Employer (but not informed USCIS), travelling on AP" .
A couple of points : 485 is your property. Its a grey area whether to inform USCIS or not, some advocate it as its a proof and file AC21 and some have different opinion its a personal choice. Regarding using AP I myself dont see an issue. Rest of all are supporting dox. Nice to have supporting documents.
Informing USCIS is nothing but officially filing AC21. Since there are no forms its just a letter indicating AC21.
A couple of points : 485 is your property. Its a grey area whether to inform USCIS or not, some advocate it as its a proof and file AC21 and some have different opinion its a personal choice. Regarding using AP I myself dont see an issue. Rest of all are supporting dox. Nice to have supporting documents.
Informing USCIS is nothing but officially filing AC21. Since there are no forms its just a letter indicating AC21.
girlfriend 2011 Golden Globes Awards
cheg
08-31 10:49 PM
Hi. I got this from srid123 and after reading your post, this is exactly what you're looking for. Very helpful and informative. Good luck!
http://tijuanatrip.blogspot.com/
http://tijuanatrip.blogspot.com/
hairstyles Nicole Kidman 2011 Golden
vullankib
06-29 04:09 PM
It will be renewal
wandmaker
08-18 08:58 AM
Hello Gurus,
Pl guide me and let me know my options for the below scenario...
1. Me: Applied under EB2 (India) and have I-140 approved in September 2006.
Status as of now : Applied as dependent (secondary) on my spouse 485 and have EAD and AP since July 2007.
2. My spouse : Primary applicant - EB3 (India), December 2003.
As the dates are NOT moving forward for EB3 (India), I want to port our GC application dates from my spouse priority ( EB3- India - December 2003) to mine (EB2 - India - September 2006)
My question is, Can I change my status from dependent (secondary ) on my spouse 485 to me being primary applicant by invoking my approved I-140 (EB2 - India - September 2006), If YES what would be the process.
Thanks in advance
You cant port because it is different labor of two different people. As far as I know, when the EB2 (India - September 2006), labor date is current, you can file another 485 as primary and your spouse as dependent. Optionally, you can choose to withdraw your previous filings. Hope, this helps. Others can throw some light on this.
Pl guide me and let me know my options for the below scenario...
1. Me: Applied under EB2 (India) and have I-140 approved in September 2006.
Status as of now : Applied as dependent (secondary) on my spouse 485 and have EAD and AP since July 2007.
2. My spouse : Primary applicant - EB3 (India), December 2003.
As the dates are NOT moving forward for EB3 (India), I want to port our GC application dates from my spouse priority ( EB3- India - December 2003) to mine (EB2 - India - September 2006)
My question is, Can I change my status from dependent (secondary ) on my spouse 485 to me being primary applicant by invoking my approved I-140 (EB2 - India - September 2006), If YES what would be the process.
Thanks in advance
You cant port because it is different labor of two different people. As far as I know, when the EB2 (India - September 2006), labor date is current, you can file another 485 as primary and your spouse as dependent. Optionally, you can choose to withdraw your previous filings. Hope, this helps. Others can throw some light on this.
GCDeramzz
06-20 09:18 AM
I am also in the same boat as you and my attorney has sent my Labor ETA 750 to DOL for changing the box 15. It is good to change it now at Labor stage as there is quite lot rejection at I140 stage if your degree is 3 years..so it is better to have it ammended at Labor stage.
I would say all those who are waiting on Labor with 3 Years degree should make sure that your Labor states that it a "combination" else you will be trouble.
- GCDreamzz
My two cents.
I would say all those who are waiting on Labor with 3 Years degree should make sure that your Labor states that it a "combination" else you will be trouble.
- GCDreamzz
My two cents.
0 komentar:
Posting Komentar